Procurement details: UKEB website redevelopment project (Phase 2 - Alpha, Beta, Live)

1. Context and requirements

Terms and acronyms

Term or acronym

UKEB (UK Endorsement Board)

Definition

UKEB (UK Endorsement Board) - The UKEB influences, endorses and adopts new or amended international accounting standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) for use by UK companies. UKEB website - https://www.endorsement-board.uk/

Term or acronym

FRC (Financial Reporting Council)

Definition

FRC (Financial Reporting Council) - UK regulator for auditors, accountants and actuaries, which also sets the UK's Corporate Governance and Stewardship Codes. The FRC provides operational resource and support to the UKEB, via a Service Level Agreement.

Summary of work

The UKEB / FRC has undertaken a Phase 1 Discovery / User Research. Following on from our Discovery phase were are proceeding with the report recommendations to: * Run a design-led Alpha phase focused on information architecture and content design * Redesign the site in line with GOV.UK standards and the design recommendations derived from user needs * Develop the new website in an open-source, monolithic CMS to reduce costs, simplify technology and meet priority user and editorial needs * Focus development on priority user and organisational needs, also considering additional technical recommendations This should be delivered with a timeline of 6 weeks for Alpha and 8-10 weeks for Beta to Live.

Where the supplied staff will work

No specific location (for example they can work remotely)

Who the organisation using the products or services is

N/A - this will be a public tool

Why the work is being done

The UKEB requires a robust, cost-effective Content Management System which provides an easy-to-use experience for authors and editors. Site users require an improved experience, especially in terms of finding content and navigating around the website.

The business problem

The UKEB's current website lacks basic features, such as a search engine and effective navigation, which makes content hard to find for users as the website grows. The website also lacks Accessibility compliance to a WCAG 2.2. AA standard. The authoring environment relies on publishing pipelines that are not instantaneous and subject to occasional failure.

The people who will use the product or service

User type

Various - as below

Definition

The primary audience groups for the UKEB website are: • Accounting Firms & Institutes • Preparers • Academics Investors • Investors

Any pre-market engagement done

Work done so far

Phase 1 - Discovery phase - User research / insights.

Which phase the project is in

Alpha

Existing team

The team consists of the FRC's Digital and Website Manager (who acts as project manager for this development) and the UKEB's Operations Director (Senior Responsible Officer) and Operations Officer (day-to-day management of current website).

Address where the work will be done

Remotely

Working arrangements

The supplier's staff will work in their own premises and UKEB/ FRC is not responsible for providing any work infrastructure. Virtual meetings can be arranged to work with UKEB/ FRC between 9.00am and 5.00pm BST Monday to Friday. However, the UKEB/ FRC is willing to facilitate face-to-face meetings at the UKEB's London / Canary Wharf office, if required and agreed by both parties.

Security and vetting requirements

Baseline Personnel Security Standard (BPSS)

More information about the Security requirements

TBC

Latest start date

3 January 2025

Expected contract length

Contract length

2 years 0 months 0 days

Optional extension

Special terms and conditions

special term or condition

Note - The maximum budget is £130,000 (excluding VAT and any additional costs such as hosting, support etc). The stage 2 timelines are yet to be finalised.

Budget

Indicative maximum

£130000

Indicative minimum

The contract value is not specified by the buyer

Further information

Contracted out service or supply of resource?

Contracted out service: the off-payroll rules do not apply

2. Assessment criteria

How many suppliers to evaluate

3

Technical Competence

70%

Cultural fit

10%

Social values

0%

Price

20%

Technical competence

Essential skills and experience

35%

Nice-to-have skills and experience

5%

Technical questions

60%

Essential skills and experience

Description

1. Recent experience, expertise and transferrable skills in projects of this nature, your response should including an outline of the open-source monolithic CMS proposed for this project?

Weighting

35%

Description

2. Robust and effective approach(es) and methodology for delivery of this requirement, including the lifecycle of the proposed CMS. For example, when does the current version reach end of life, what is the upgrade process and would this require further significant investment?

Weighting

35%

Description

3. Recent experience of redesign websites in line with GOV.UK standards and the design recommendations derived from user needs.

Weighting

30%

Nice-to-have skills and experience

Description

1. Experience of recommending and supporting approaches to hosting, post-launch support and continuous improvement (please provide examples).

Weighting

100%

Technical questions

Question

To be provide at Stage 2

Weighting

100%

Cultural fit questions

Question

1. How will you manage the project and ensure that important decisions or changes within are communicated, and agreed, in a transparent and timely manner with relevant stakeholders involved in the project? (50%)

Weighting

50%

Question

2. Can you share a recent example where your organisation learned from a setback and how this learning is transferrable to this project and promotes a culture of continuous learning? (50%)

Weighting

50%

Social value questions

Pricing model

Capped time and materials

Additional assessment methods

Interview

Work history

Question and answer session details

How suppliers will be scored

Level

Not Considered Relevant

Score

0

Description

0 = Not Considered Relevant

Level

Poor and Only Partially Relevant

Score

20

Description

20 = Poor and Only Partially Relevant

Level

Limited and Partially Relevant

Score

40

Description

40 = Limited and Partially Relevant

Level

Satisfactory and Relevant

Score

60

Description

60 = Satisfactory and Relevant

Level

Good and Highly Relevant

Score

80

Description

80 = Good and Highly Relevant

Level

Excellent and Completely Relevant

Score

100

Description

100 = Excellent and Completely Relevant

3. Timeline

Publication of stage 1

03/10/2024

Clarification period closes

11/10/2024 12:00

Deadline for suppliers to submit their stage 1 responses

17/10/2024 16:00