Procurement details: Prison Case Management Functionality

1. Context and requirements

Terms and acronyms

Summary of work

Provision of one or more multidisciplinary digital teams to build new digital services to replace discrete functionality in a legacy system. May also involve the purchase of an off the shelf finance product which will require integration.

Where the supplied staff will work

Yorkshire and the Humber

Where the supplied staff will work

London

Where the supplied staff will work

No specific location (for example they can work remotely)

Who the organisation using the products or services is

Ministry of Justice, Justice Digital Team

Why the work is being done

The MOJ has a bold strategic vision for the delivery of digital, data and technology in His Majesty's Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) which includes: ● replacing prison legacy systems with simpler, clearer, faster digital services ● capturing, storing and sharing high quality data across services leading to better and faster decision-making The MOJ Digital and Technology Strategy for 2025 has three themes, all of which provide a clear association and support for this work. These themes comprise: Theme 1: Data: We need to have access to more of our data, understand what data is most important to us, have one source of the truth for that data and have the capabilities in place to be able to leverage that data. Theme 2: Organisational Flexibility: We need to be less reliant on legacy systems and paper-based processes to be more nimble and efficient as an organisation. The ultimate goal is to be able to respond to policy or process change quickly, and effectively. Theme 3: Orientating around our users: We need to break the cycle of creating complex policy then complex processes to deliver that policy and then complex systems to support those processes. We want to work in a truly multidisciplinary way with policy and operational colleagues from the inception of a policy idea, to fundamentally change the way that we are operating as an organisation. The MOJ has made progress in developing user-centred design services, transforming the lives of those using and interacting with them. Many of the products and services developed in the last few years are however constrained with the requirement to return data to legacy systems such as NOMIS, Delius and OASyS. MOJ is now at a critical stage where we need to replace more substantial elements of the legacy systems so that we are a) able to switch off larger pieces of the estate and b) enable more transformational development which is free from those constraints.

The business problem

In the 2025 Justice Digital Strategy we committed to deliver digital prison services that replace legacy systems and support rehabilitation. Prison legacy systems are not fit for purpose, difficult to change and result in staff inefficiencies and inflexible, duplicated data. Our goal is to replace the core case management legacy prison systems with a suite of modern, digital services that have a simple, consistent user interface, are interoperable and easy to change. This work is well underway but we do not have the internal capacity to deliver all the work required to meet this goal. As a result we wish to procure a supplier who can provide one or more multidisciplinary digital teams to build new digital services to replace discrete functionality in the legacy system. The supplier teams will be focused on functionality which does not require significant process transformation. The supplier will help us to replace various elements of functionality in the legacy core case management system (NOMIS), the first one being Financials. We envisage some of this will be build, and some integration of a commercial off the shelf finance product, which the supplier will research and source. Financial transactions within the prison service such as fines, payment for work or sending money to family in prison, are currently processed via a ledger in NOMIS, which we will be replacing. Financials will be the first initiative taken forward in the initial period of the contract, followed by other areas of functionality as the work progresses.

The people who will use the product or service

User type

Prisoners and people on probation

Definition

These are our end users and often reliant on the output of our services.

User type

HMPPS operational front line staff

Definition

Prison officers and support staff who need efficient tools that enable them to deliver prison operations and have effective relationships with prisoners and people on probation.

User type

HMPPS administration staff

Definition

Prison administration staff who need quick, efficient and more importantly accurate systems and data to support the day to day running of the establishment.

User type

HMPPS operational management

Definition

Prison management require confidence that the systems and activities of the staff are operating effectively, accurately and efficiently to manage the prison and achieve prison targets.

User type

HMPPS national and regional operation teams

Definition

Prison management require confidence that the systems and activities of the staff are operating effectively, accurately and efficiently to manage the prison and achieve prison targets.

User type

HMPPS National Policy teams

Definition

Need confidence that prison policies and practices are being followed.

Any pre-market engagement done

N/A

Work done so far

We have a good understanding of our legacy prison systems and an agreed product and technical strategy for how that will replace it. We have already delivered several digital services to the operational front line and have started to switch off legacy systems.

Which phase the project is in

Not started

Existing team

There is no existing team. The supplier will be working with MoJ stakeholders across the prison and probation organisation. Subject matter experts will be available to work with the team but all other delivery roles are expected to be resourced by the managed service provider.

Address where the work will be done

UK Based. Prisons Digital teams are based mainly in Sheffield and London, however we are also building our presence in Leeds, Birmingham and Cardiff (moving towards co-located teams, out of London).

Working arrangements

There will be a requirement for visits to prisons, regional offices particularly for research. There may also be a requirement to travel for meetings in Sheffield or London. Outside of these visits and any meetings, there is no requirement to be office-based and individuals can work from home. The supplier costs need to be inclusive of travel and expenses.

Security and vetting requirements

Baseline Personnel Security Standard (BPSS)

Security and vetting requirements

Security Check (SC)

More information about the Security requirements

A minimum of Baseline Personnel Security Standard (BPSS) standard is required. Where access to live production data is necessary, Security Clearance (SC) will also be required.

Latest start date

1 November 2024

Expected contract length

Contract length

2 years 0 months 0 days

Optional extension

1 years 0 months 0 days

Special terms and conditions

special term or condition

Deliverables are expected to align to the HMPPS Architecture Blueprint The supplier may initially be required to provide a level of 3rd-line product support for the products they build. This support will ultimately be handed over to an internal HMPPS-Digital team however it is important that products are built using the standard HMPPS technology stack. Broadly speaking, this is: For user-interface focussed components: ● TypeScript ● Javascript ● Node JS ● gov.uk design system Template application repo for a front end service For data-management focussed components: ● Kotlin ● Spring Boot ● AWS RDS for PostgreSQL Template application repo for a back end service Other technologies in use: ● Source Code Repository : Github ● Automated deployment pipeline: CircleCI ● Docker Container management: Kubernetes ● Hosting: MOJ’s Cloud Platform Many products built using these technologies are already in production - the supplier will have many examples to refer to on how to build products the “HMPPS way”.

Budget

Indicative maximum

£7000000

Indicative minimum

The contract value is not specified by the buyer

Further information

Up to £6m - £7m

Contracted out service or supply of resource?

Contracted out service: the off-payroll rules do not apply

2. Assessment criteria

How many suppliers to evaluate

3

Technical Competence

60%

Cultural fit

10%

Social values

10%

Price

20%

Technical competence

Essential skills and experience

20%

Nice-to-have skills and experience

20%

Technical questions

60%

Essential skills and experience

Description

Proven track record of delivering digital services to, and/or on behalf of, Government Agencies throughout the product life cycle (discovery, alpha, beta, live) and meeting the government digital service standard and the technology code of practice.

Weighting

20%

Description

Delivering significant operational impact by improving, rationalising and/or standardising reporting services and processes within an organisation.

Weighting

20%

Description

Experience of leading investigative user research into problems & opportunities, gathering & analysing information and producing clear, compelling, evidence-based recommendations.

Weighting

20%

Description

Experience of service design and agile, incremental digital delivery that delivers value early and iteratively.

Weighting

20%

Description

Proven experience & expertise of collaborating across teams and departments and transferring ownership and knowledge to in-house teams.

Weighting

20%

Nice-to-have skills and experience

Description

Experience within the prisons and probation environment.

Weighting

20%

Description

Knowledge of the wider Criminal Justice system and the systems which are part of the user and data journey.

Weighting

20%

Description

Experience of working within a complex public policy and service environment

Weighting

20%

Description

Working within a government programme that requires close working with other civil service teams and managed services.

Weighting

20%

Description

Knowledge of current and emerging finance technology.

Weighting

10%

Description

Experience of evaluating and integrating off the shelf products.

Weighting

10%

Technical questions

Question

A recent case study of a similar project, using similar technologies, that explains your approach and methodology and how it can ensure successful delivery.

Weighting

30%

Question

Provide examples of how you have used innovative techniques to investigate and solve problems and how you have identified and delivered value early and iteratively.

Weighting

20%

Question

Provide an example team structure including skills, experience, responsibilities and the relevance of individuals. Explain how you will ensure the team delivers their responsibilities throughout this approach.

Weighting

20%

Question

Provide a project plan for what your team would deliver during the timescales, how would you split the time between the project phases - e.g. discovery, alpha, beta etc.

Weighting

10%

Question

Demonstrate how you will deliver value for money throughout this project.

Weighting

10%

Question

Demonstrate how you would ensure an effective hand over of the services to the in-house team.

Weighting

10%

Cultural fit questions

Question

Work collaboratively with Justice Digital colleagues, including stakeholders with varying understanding of agile methodologies.

Weighting

25%

Question

Consider the needs of all users of varying backgrounds and abilities when designing, building and implementing digital services.

Weighting

25%

Question

Is innovative and forward thinking, shares knowledge, experience and honest feedback with clients and takes responsibility for the quality of their work.

Weighting

25%

Question

Able to demonstrate the value of their approach and understands the value of data and analytics.

Weighting

25%

Social value questions

Question

Encourages new entrees to their digital professions and upskills and develops their workforce.

Weighting

50%

Question

Encourages diverse representation in their workforce.

Weighting

50%

Pricing model

Capped time and materials

Additional assessment methods

Presentation

Case study

Question and answer session details

How suppliers will be scored

Level

Not met

Score

0

Description

The response does not meet any of the requirements or no response has been provided. An unacceptable and / or non-compliant response with serious reservations, demonstrating no understanding of the requirement.

Level

Partially met

Score

1

Description

The response has met some, but not all elements of the requirement, which poses risk that the proposal will not meet the deliverables required. The response does not demonstrate a full understanding of the requirement posing major concerns.

Level

Met

Score

2

Description

The response is acceptable and meets all the basic requirements. However, the response is not sufficiently detailed to minimise risk and / or the proposed approach may require additional support (in addition to that outlined in the Statement of Requirements) from the Contracting Authority to meet its deliverables.

Level

Exceeded

Score

3

Description

The response exceeds requirements, providing detail that minimises risks to delivery. The response is comprehensive and unambiguous, demonstrating a thorough understanding of the requirements and providing details of how the requirement will be met in full without additional support from the Contracting Authority, other than that outlined within the Statement of Requirements.

3. Timeline

Publication of stage 1

25/07/2024

Clarification period closes

30/07/2024 16:00

Deadline for suppliers to submit their stage 1 responses

12/08/2024 16:00