Procurement details: RM1043.8-1-University of Northumbria at Newcastle Culture Connect Data Observatory

1. Context and requirements

Terms and acronyms

Summary of work

We are inviting bids to co-develop and pilot a new open access data observatory for culture in the North of Tyne Combined Authority (NoTCA); the biggest geographic devolved area in England from May 2024. The pilot will bring communities, cultural organisations and venues, the devolved authority (as well as its 12 member councils) and national government closer together to better understand the cultural footprint of public users as they move across the cultural offerings of the devolved region. It aims to upskill users to achieve a new awareness and agency of their data and digital footprint through an integrated cross-sector approach to sustainable digital literacy and co-creation within a city region.

Where the supplied staff will work

No specific location (for example they can work remotely)

Who the organisation using the products or services is

University of Northumbria at Newcastle

Why the work is being done

The Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) creative communities programme is a UK research and innovation (UKRI) investment that aims to capture new understanding of how culture can address regional inequality and help level up the UK. We are working with academic, third and private sector partners to identify and profile examples of good practice and innovations in partnership working and to explore the potential for AHRC research to help build creative communities of the future across all nations of the UK.

The business problem

Developing a shared, live database, the pilot will enable new exchange of knowledge between stakeholders interested in using data for social good. Public users will be acknowledged and rewarded for their engagement through enhanced user experiences from the participating cultural organisations and venues, while the cultural sector and devolved authorities will benefit from access to new data and insight about how, where and when community members move across cultural spaces within a place. The collaborative governance of the pilot will produce an ongoing dialogue as the website is developed and piloted so that it is co-evaluated from inception and generates long-term relationships that can be adopted by the parties and taken forward beyond the lifetime of the award.

The people who will use the product or service

User type

Policy Makers

Definition

Local Government decision makers and those that develop local policy

User type

Third Sector Workers

Definition

People who work for Charities or Not for profit organisations.

User type

Academics and Researchers

Definition

University and collaborative partners involved in research to support this activity

Any pre-market engagement done

Work done so far

Which phase the project is in

Not applicable

Existing team

The project has been co-designed with national (DCMS, ACE, RSA) and devolved partners (M10, WYCA, NoTCA, Newcastle Cultural Compact and NGCV, Newcastle City Council) to ensure it is fit for purpose and can achieve maximum reach and impact within the timeframe of funding.

Address where the work will be done

University of Northumbria and possible partner locations.

Working arrangements

This will be mostly remote with possible face to face meetings to be agreed.

Security and vetting requirements

Baseline Personnel Security Standard (BPSS)

More information about the Security requirements

The above is desirable but not Mandatory

Latest start date

17 May 2024

Expected contract length

Contract length

0 years 4 months 0 days

Optional extension

0 years 2 months 0 days

Special terms and conditions

Budget

Indicative maximum

The contract value is not specified by the buyer

Indicative minimum

The contract value is not specified by the buyer

Further information

Contracted out service or supply of resource?

Contracted out service: the off-payroll rules do not apply

2. Assessment criteria

How many suppliers to evaluate

5

Technical Competence

50%

Cultural fit

15%

Social values

15%

Price

20%

Technical competence

Essential skills and experience

50%

Nice-to-have skills and experience

Technical questions

50%

Essential skills and experience

Description

Ability to meet the specification and timeline

Weighting

50%

Description

Example of related work with details relating to approach.

Weighting

50%

Nice-to-have skills and experience

Description

Weighting

Technical questions

Question

Could you please outline a delivery schedule, detailing your anticipated delivery of the work packages and check in points with the team? Please include details of your understanding of the project requirements and specification, how you will approach each element to ensure a successful outcome.

Weighting

100%

Cultural fit questions

Question

Please advise how you will ensure collaboration across a range of stakeholders?

Weighting

100%

Social value questions

Question

Please explain the efforts made towards sustainability in this work offering?

Weighting

100%

Pricing model

Time and materials

Additional assessment methods

Case study

Question and answer session details

How suppliers will be scored

Level

Unacceptable

Score

0

Description

Nil or inadequate response. Fails to demonstrate previous experience/capacity/capability relevant to this criterion

Level

Poor

Score

1

Description

Response is partially relevant but generally poor. The response shows some elements of relevance to the criterion but contains insufficient/limited detail or explanation to demonstrate previous experience/capacity/capability.

Level

Acceptable

Score

2

Description

Response is relevant and acceptable. The response demonstrates broad previous experience, knowledge or skills/capacity/capability but may lack in some aspects of similarity e.g. previous experience, knowledge or skills may not be of similar nature.

Level

Good

Score

3

Description

Response is relevant and good. The response is sufficiently detailed to demonstrate a good amount of experience, knowledge or skills/capacity/capability relevant to providing a similar service to similar clients.

Level

Excellent

Score

4

Description

Response is completely relevant and excellent overall. The response is comprehensive, unambiguous and demonstrates through experience, knowledge or skills/capacity/capability relevant to providing similar service to similar clients.

3. Timeline

Publication of stage 1

23/04/2024

Clarification period closes

26/04/2024 16:00

Deadline for suppliers to submit their stage 1 responses

30/04/2024 17:00