Procurement details: RM1043.8-1-Defence Science and Technology Laboratory- Software tools for CB hazard prediction modelling

1. Context and requirements

Terms and acronyms

Term or acronym

UDM

Definition

Urban Dispersion Model

Term or acronym

SPT

Definition

Sensor Placement Tool

Term or acronym

STE2

Definition

Source Term Estimation

Term or acronym

HPAC

Definition

Hazard Prediction and Assessment Capability

Term or acronym

CBFac

Definition

CB Facility

Term or acronym

SLOPS

Definition

Spills of Liquid On Porous Surfaces.

Term or acronym

TOF

Definition

Tasking Form

Term or acronym

SoR

Definition

Statement of Requirement

Summary of work

The CBR Division at Dstl develop and use models to predict and understand the hazards posed by deliberate (malicious) or accidental release of CB material. Software support is required to update and enhance existing tools, and to develop new tools to provide additional functionality. This overarching requirement comprises a number of smaller, discrete software tasks. Dstl has a number of specific requirements broadly covering: • Updating existing tools/systems to take advantage of the modernisation of software systems and IT infrastructure within Dstl; • Developing tools/scripts to enable the automation of data handling along modelling chains; • The extension of existing tools to add functionality.

Where the supplied staff will work

No specific location (for example they can work remotely)

Who the organisation using the products or services is

Why the work is being done

The CBR Division at Dstl develop and use models to predict and understand the hazards posed by deliberate (malicious) or accidental release of CB material. Software support is required to update and enhance existing tools, and to develop new tools to provide additional functionality. This overarching requirement comprises a number of smaller, discrete software tasks.

The business problem

Over the last 20 years, Dstl has developed a suite of computer models relating to predicting the airborne dispersion of, and hazards generated by, chemical and biological (CB) materials. This includes the Urban Dispersion Model (UDM), Sensor Placement Tool (SPT), Source Term Estimation (STE2), as well as frameworks to integrate models. Dstl has a number of specific requirements broadly covering: • Updating existing tools/systems to take advantage of the modernisation of software systems and IT infrastructure within Dstl; • Developing tools/scripts to enable the automation of data handling along modelling chains; • The extension of existing tools to add functionality.

The people who will use the product or service

User type

Dstl

Definition

Need the software in order to conduct modelling simulation so that Dstl can carry out the required research and provide advice based off of the data

Any pre-market engagement done

Work done so far

Which phase the project is in

Discovery

Existing team

The supplier will have access to the in-house statistical, mathematical, software and wider expertise within the CBR division at Dstl. Further details will be shared during the implementation phase.

Address where the work will be done

DSTL Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP4 0JQ

Working arrangements

An agile approach is suggested for each requested task to be able to explore any uncertainty on either side with regards to the requirements. There should be a kick-off meeting to agree the approach and discuss the work plan. A sprint kick-off and completion meeting are required, with additional sprint progress reviews as agreed during the kick-off meeting. Code should be made available at the end of each Sprint to allow Dstl to review and provide feedback.

Security and vetting requirements

Security Check (SC)

Latest start date

31 October 2023

Expected contract length

Contract length

2 years 0 months 0 days

Optional extension

Special terms and conditions

Budget

Indicative maximum

£600000

Indicative minimum

The contract value is not specified by the buyer

Further information

Contracted out service or supply of resource?

Contracted out service: the off-payroll rules do not apply

2. Assessment criteria

How many suppliers to evaluate

5

Technical Competence

50%

Cultural fit

10%

Social values

10%

Price

30%

Technical competence

Essential skills and experience

40%

Nice-to-have skills and experience

10%

Technical questions

50%

Essential skills and experience

Description

Experience of development of software systems combining multiple different components

Weighting

10%

Description

Experience of developing extensible and modular software systems

Weighting

10%

Description

Experience of producing high quality and robust Application Programmers Interfaces (APIs)

Weighting

10%

Description

Experience of producing high quality and robust testing for software systems

Weighting

10%

Description

Experience of producing high quality user experiences for software

Weighting

10%

Description

Experience of producing high quality, succinct software documentation

Weighting

10%

Description

Experience of communicating technical software information to non-software technical staff

Weighting

10%

Description

Experience of working in complex scientific domains

Weighting

10%

Description

Experience in working with software and tools written in C++ and Java

Weighting

10%

Description

Experience of using code control systems appropriately

Weighting

10%

Nice-to-have skills and experience

Description

Experience of working using Agile methodologies

Weighting

50%

Description

Knowledge of Chemical, Biological and Radiological (CBR) systems

Weighting

20%

Description

Experience of working with software and tools written in Fortran, Python, R, Matlab, Mathematica

Weighting

20%

Description

Experience of working with systems that use OSGi

Weighting

10%

Technical questions

Question

Please provide the technical approach for the requirement, including the work plan and anything else of relevance

Weighting

25%

Question

What prior experience and technical expertise does your organisation have, please provide evidence

Weighting

25%

Question

Please outline your risks/dependencies for the requirement, how will these be monitored to ensure the project delivers to time, cost and quality

Weighting

25%

Question

How does your organisation intend to deliver the requirement, please include a detailed breakdown of the deliverables and how they will be demonstrated on Dstl systems

Weighting

25%

Cultural fit questions

Question

How would you work as a team within our organisation and how have you previously worked with other suppliers? Please provide evidence (maximum of 150 words)

Weighting

25%

Question

Can your organisation show that they can be transparent and collaborative? Please provide evidence of any decision making processes (maximum of 150 words)

Weighting

25%

Question

Does your organisation have a fail-fast and no-blame culture that encourages people to learn from their mistakes. Have the issues been rapidly identified and remedied. Please provide evidence (maximum of 150 words)

Weighting

25%

Question

Is your organisation used to providing "government-source" software, with sufficient documentation such that others can enhance/maintain it. (maximum of 150 words)

Weighting

25%

Social value questions

Question

Policy Outcome: Create new businesses, new jobs and new skills. Using a maximum of 500 words describe the commitment your organisation will make to ensure that opportunities under the contract deliver the Policy Outcome and Create employment and training opportunities particularly for those who face barriers to employment and/or who are located in deprived areas, and for people in industries with known skills shortages or in high growth sectors. (Award criteria) Please include: ● your ‘Method Statement’, stating how you will achieve this and how your commitment meets the Award Criteria, and ● a timed project plan and process, including how you will implement your commitment and by when. Also, how you will monitor, measure and report on your commitments/the impact of your proposals. You should include but not be limited to: ○ timed action plan ○ use of metrics ○ tools/processes used to gather data ○ reporting ○ feedback and improvement ○ transparency ● how you will influence staff, suppliers, customers and communities through the delivery of the contract to support the Policy Outcome, e.g. engagement, co-design/creation, training and education, partnering/collaborating, volunteering

Weighting

50%

Question

Policy Outcome: Reduce the disability employment gap. Using a maximum of 500 words describe the commitment your organisation will make to ensure that opportunities under the contract deliver the Policy Outcome and Demonstrate action to increase the representation of disabled people in the contract workforce. (Award criteria) Please include: ● your ‘Method Statement’, stating how you will achieve this and how your commitment meets the Award Criteria, and ● a timed project plan and process, including how you will implement your commitment and by when. Also, how you will monitor, measure and report on your commitments/the impact of your proposals. You should include but not be limited to: ○ timed action plan ○ use of metrics ○ tools/processes used to gather data ○ reporting ○ feedback and improvement ○ transparency ● how you will influence staff, suppliers, customers and communities through the delivery of the contract to support the Policy Outcome, e.g. engagement, co-design/creation, training and education, partnering/collaborating, volunteering

Weighting

25%

Question

Policy Outcome: Effective stewardship of the environment. Using a maximum of 500 words describe the commitment your organisation will make to ensure that opportunities under the contract deliver the Policy Outcome and Influence staff, suppliers, customers and communities through the delivery of the contract to support environmental protection and improvement. (Award criteria) Please include: ● your ‘Method Statement’, stating how you will achieve this and how your commitment meets the Award Criteria, and ● a timed project plan and process, including how you will implement your commitment and by when. Also, how you will monitor, measure and report on your commitments/the impact of your proposals. You should include but not be limited to: ○ timed action plan ○ use of metrics ○ tools/processes used to gather data ○ reporting ○ feedback and improvement ○ transparency

Weighting

25%

Pricing model

Fixed price

Additional assessment methods

Case study

Work history

Question and answer session details

How suppliers will be scored

Level

Exceeded

Score

3

Description

The response exceeds requirements, providing detail that minimises risks to delivery. The response is comprehensive and unambiguous, demonstrating a thorough understanding of the requirements and providing details of how the requirement will be met in full without additional support from the Contracting Authority, other than that outlined within the Statement of Requirements.

Level

Met

Score

2

Description

The response is acceptable and meets all the basic requirements. However, the response is not sufficiently detailed to minimise risk and / or the proposed approach may require additional support (in addition to that outlined in the Statement of Requirements) from the Contracting Authority to meet its deliverables.

Level

Partially met

Score

1

Description

The response has met some, but not all elements of the requirement, which poses risk that the proposal will not meet the deliverables required. The response does not demonstrate a full understanding of the requirement posing major concerns.

Level

Not met

Score

0

Description

The response does not meet any of the requirements or no response has been provided. An unacceptable and / or non-compliant response with serious reservations, demonstrating no understanding of the requirement.

3. Timeline

Publication of stage 1

22/08/2023

Clarification period closes

29/08/2023 16:00

Deadline for suppliers to submit their stage 1 responses

11/09/2023 17:00